|
|
Post by nerasa on Jul 24, 2008 1:10:23 GMT -5
You were too? My friend and I were whispering about what they were messed up on during the whole movie. I mean I own it but still I critisise it still. doesn't Galbatorix look old in the movie? I thought he would have looked younger. Oh well they picked a good acter for Galbatorix though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Max452 on Jul 24, 2008 1:18:03 GMT -5
haha, yeah, my friend next to me kept telling me to be quiet because i kept predicting what the characters were going to say. note: I hadn't read the books yet. I think they picked good actors for Brom and Galbatorix, they just needed to work on everything else!
|
|
|
|
Post by nerasa on Jul 24, 2008 1:19:32 GMT -5
yeah I agree they did. I really didn't like Ed speelers though I think he is okay but I didn't like him in that role as eragon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Max452 on Jul 24, 2008 1:25:22 GMT -5
I have mix feelings on Ed Speelers. He was okay, but I really thought they could have done better in choosing Eragon. I did think that the voice of Saphira was a good choice too.
|
|
|
|
Post by nerasa on Jul 24, 2008 1:37:54 GMT -5
So did I. I liked the voice of Saphira because thats sort of how I sort of saw it well heard it mor likely. Well what I didn't like about it though that she grew to fast and that she had said her name was Saphira and Eragon didn't choose it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Max452 on Jul 24, 2008 18:50:02 GMT -5
Yeah! I didn't like how they made that growth spur happen so quickly. And also the fact that they didn't show Eragon talking with Brom about Dragons was lame. You can tell that they just wanted to make the movie fast, rather than accurate.
|
|
|
|
Post by nerasa on Jul 24, 2008 19:23:51 GMT -5
Totally true I don't think they wanted to take the time or the money to make it a good movie. They are so Arses and Jerks.  |
|
|
|
Post by Max452 on Jul 25, 2008 15:12:31 GMT -5
I totally agree. I also think that they were trying to hard in surpassing the other dragon movies out there. With that in mind, they probably concentrated on making the effects look really good while the story and plotline suffers.
|
|
|
|
Post by nerasa on Jul 27, 2008 20:40:36 GMT -5
totally agree with that although the did mess up a lot of things there. I think they need to make everything perfect if you know what I mean.
|
|
|
|
Post by godzillama on Sept 21, 2008 20:13:02 GMT -5
I didn't like ANYTHING about the movie. They changed pretty much everything but the basic plot line and stuff. Why the heck did the Ra'zac die so early? Why does Durza have a giant ghost bat thingy? Why does Eragon look like some sissy boy who cries if he chips a nail? They should totally re-make the movie in a few years with a director who actually cares and has enough money to make it a success. yep.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tismri on Sept 23, 2008 21:06:53 GMT -5
I thought it was a good enough movie on its own, but it just wasn't very good when compared with the book. But, yeah, I think they should redo it before attempting Eldest. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Oct 11, 2008 19:19:17 GMT -5
It is a paradox, if the book didn't exist, the movie would look good, but the movie came from the book, so it sucks, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tismri on Nov 8, 2008 20:13:01 GMT -5
I thought the actor for Galbatorix was awesome. That's exactly how I imagined him...well, except that I think he has hair. lol.
I liked the actor from Brom except he doesn't look a thing like th book Brom.
Uh...they definately could have chosen a better actor for Eragon. I didn't like Ed Speelers.
Arya...no...just...no.
Ajihad was good, but he was supposed to have a shaved head.
Nasuada wasn't in there much, but what I did see, I likes. I think she will be good in the Eldest movie.
Uh...I guess that's it. That's all the characters I can think of. They better pick someone good for Elva, or I'm gonna sue! lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by linea on Nov 18, 2008 23:08:07 GMT -5
I was quite disappointed, I must say, with a lot of stuff. Galby was good, and I liked Saphira's voice. They made Brom more eccentric, and Eragon a bit of a cry baby. They rushed Murtagh's history and totally took away its significance.
Arya was. . . . . I can't even say it.
Durza was plenty weird and I disliked the Ra'zak. And why did they have Durza make them? Argh!
And they shouldn't have bothered putting Angela in there they messed her up so bad.
Ok, done ranting. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Nov 19, 2008 20:37:08 GMT -5
Arya=wtf
Galby=excellent
Saphira=hmm...
Murtagh=yeah!
Durza=perfect
Ra'zac=wtf
Angela=she was in there?
Brom=perfect younger version
|
|
